Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Jenifer K. Wofford and Johanna Poethig

Both Jenifer Wofford and Johanna Poethig’s work examine the complexities of Philippine identity. Wofford reexamines the idea of the Filipino nurse and under the issues of power, gender, and immigration she evokes a style of modern ambiguity, which I view as a means of challenging her audience to rethink the stereotypes and iconic imagery off which she plays. And on a different level Poethig’s work delves into Philippine history, exploring the political strife, which led many to move outside of the country’s borders during the early – mid 80s. I found her perspective unique, as it is one of a child of American missionaries growing up in the Philippines. Her position seems to be a physical reversal of the idea of “the other” which we often examine in class.

Personally I enjoyed the discussion of the history and controversy surrounding Poethig’s work LAKAS SAMBAYANAN. The piece itself, commemorating the People Power Revolution, illustrated the complexities of the Filipino experience during the fall of the Marcos regime. Heavily covered in cultural iconography, the seemingly simple mural holds a multitude of meanings. The vibrant colors and active composition seem representative of the energy, spirit, and mobilization of the people in regaining their freedom. And the striking symbolism behind the cracked statue of Marcos further emphasizes the importance of this moment in history, commemorating the country’s new potential outside of his dark shadow.

And with a personal interest in the Bay Area’s deeply rooted mural tradition, it was interesting to hear people’s thoughts regarding the notions of public and community art. In my experience I find that it is essential for such works, being in the public sphere, to speak to the concerns and identity of the surrounding community. And the erasure of the mural seems almost fitting as we witness the gentrification of such areas by the growing number of city developers. In a case where a work personally speaks to the community I believe that it is both the responsibility of the property owner and community to keep the work relevant and in tact, reflecting their own interest and care for the piece. And despite the impact of the mural at the time, it seems to have faded into the memories of those who once celebrated its meaning. but i believe that like the moment that it celebrates, it is a distant memory to those who knew of it, but nonetheless a memory of a important moment in history.

1 comment:

  1. Yes, the talk about the LAKAS SAMBAYANAN mural was really good, and I'm glad we had many different opinions about the care of the art. I always wondered if that particular mural was there not at the request of the local community, but because our community leaders were lecturing the local community on what should be important to them? Hence, its being so rife with symbols, and then eventually fading away. This way, perhaps the public has spoken? So public art is great that way, democratic.

    ReplyDelete